DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 6 vs 2013 FAW Besturn B70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn B70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFAW
6ModelBesturn B70
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h—
223 km/hTop speed207 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
175 HPPower163 HP
420 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank64 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4729 mm
1840 mmWidth1782 mm
1450 mmHeight1465 mm
1405 KgWeight1470 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 6 and 2013 FAW Besturn B70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn B70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…