2012 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (180 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
2012 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Chevrolet
Captiva
Chevrolet Captiva 2.4 Ecotec (167 Hp) 2012Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Captiva
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationChevrolet Captiva
MazdaMakeChevrolet
6ModelCaptiva
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationChevrolet Captiva
8,7 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
216 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
180 HPPower167 HP
0 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationChevrolet Captiva
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationChevrolet Captiva
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/60 R17 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationChevrolet Captiva
4765 mmLength4673 mm
1795 mmWidth1849 mm
1490 mmHeight1756 mm
1575 KgWeight1693-1798 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2707 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda 6 and 2012 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…