2008 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (180 Hp) 2008Overall Score62.5/100
2008 Mazda 6 vs 2008 Jeep Compass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Jeep
Compass
Jeep Compass 2.4 (170 Hp) 2008Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Jeep Compass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Compass
MazdaMakeJeep
6ModelCompass
2008Model year2008
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Compass
8,7 s0–100 km/h10,70 s
216 km/hTop speed183 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2359 cc
180 HPPower170 HP
0 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Compass
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank51 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption10,50 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,60 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,70 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Compass
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R17 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Compass
4765 mmLength4405 mm
1795 mmWidth1810 mm
1490 mmHeight1630 mm
1575 KgWeight1535 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Mazda 6 and 2008 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Compass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…