2007 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (180 Hp) 2007Overall Score62.5/100
2007 Mazda 6 vs 2007 Citroen C-Crosser Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Citroen
C-Crosser
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4i 16V (170) 2007Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Citroen C-Crosser
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
MazdaMakeCitroen
6ModelC-Crosser
2007Model year2007
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
8,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
216 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2359 cc
180 HPPower170 HP
0 NmTorque232 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
4765 mmLength4646 mm
1795 mmWidth1806 mm
1490 mmHeight1715 mm
1575 KgWeight1650 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2007 Mazda 6 and 2007 Citroen C-Crosser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…