DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda 6 vs 2007 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
6ModelMaverick
2007Model year2007
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
211 km/hTop speed171 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
163 HPPower150 HP
0 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4441 mm
1795 mmWidth1825 mm
1490 mmHeight1762 mm
1575 KgWeight1530 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda 6 and 2007 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…