2013 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (129 Hp) 2013Overall Score54.25/100
2013 Mazda 6 vs 2010 Chery Fora Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Chery
Fora
Chery Fora 2.0 (130 Hp) 2010Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationChery Fora
MazdaMakeChery
6ModelFora
2013Model year2010
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationChery Fora
10,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1971 cc
129 HPPower130 HP
0 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationChery Fora
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationChery Fora
4765 mmLength4552 mm
1795 mmWidth1750 mm
1490 mmHeight1483 mm
1565 KgWeight1290 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Mazda 6 and 2010 Chery Fora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…