DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 6 vs 2010 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelV50
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
11,3 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
202 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
155 HPPower136 HP
193 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
4765 mmLength4522 mm
1795 mmWidth1845 mm
1490 mmHeight1457 mm
1480 KgWeight1472 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 6 and 2010 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…