DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 6 vs 2009 Honda Accord Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Accord

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

62.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationHonda Accord
MazdaMakeHonda
6ModelAccord
2010Model year2009
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationHonda Accord
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
211 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
155 HPPower156 HP
193 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationHonda Accord
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationHonda Accord
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationHonda Accord
4765 mmLength4750 mm
1795 mmWidth1840 mm
1440 mmHeight1470 mm
1465 KgWeight1702 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 6 and 2009 Honda Accord approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Accord leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…