DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 6 vs 2013 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo S60
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelS60
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo S60
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
208 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
145 HPPower136 HP
210 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank67 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo S60
4865 mmLength4635 mm
1840 mmWidth1899 mm
1450 mmHeight1484 mm
1300 KgWeight1663 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 6 and 2013 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…