DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mazda 6 vs 2005 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSubaru
6ModelForester
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
196 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
136 HPPower158 HP
310 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16 HTyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4700 mmLength4450 mm
1780 mmWidth1735 mm
1480 mmHeight1590 mm
1465 KgWeight1360 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mazda 6 and 2005 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…