DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mazda 6 vs 2006 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
6ModelMaverick
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
206 km/hTop speed171 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
147 HPPower150 HP
184 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,0 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/55 R16 VTyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4441 mm
1780 mmWidth1825 mm
1480 mmHeight1762 mm
1370 KgWeight1530 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mazda 6 and 2006 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…