2004 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.0 (141 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
2004 Mazda 6 vs 2004 Chevrolet Classic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chevrolet
Classic
Chevrolet Classic 2.2 i 16V (141 Hp) 2004Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Classic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationChevrolet Classic
MazdaMakeChevrolet
6ModelClassic
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationChevrolet Classic
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
202 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
141 HPPower141 HP
181 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationChevrolet Classic
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank54 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationChevrolet Classic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15 VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationChevrolet Classic
4700 mmLength4835 mm
1780 mmWidth1760 mm
1480 mmHeight1425 mm
1335 KgWeight1375 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda 6 and 2004 Chevrolet Classic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Classic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…