DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 6 vs 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cavalier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChevrolet
6ModelCavalier
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
202 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
141 HPPower141 HP
181 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank53 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4700 mmLength4580 mm
1780 mmWidth1712 mm
1480 mmHeight1351 mm
1335 KgWeight1215 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2645 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 6 and 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cavalier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…