DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 6 vs 2002 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationMG ZR
MazdaMakeMG
6ModelZR
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationMG ZR
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
202 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
141 HPPower113 HP
181 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationMG ZR
4700 mmLength4011 mm
1780 mmWidth1690 mm
1480 mmHeight1400 mm
1335 KgWeight1155 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 6 and 2002 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…