DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 6 vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo C30
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelC30
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo C30
11,8 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
120 HPPower114 HP
165 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank52 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo C30
4765 mmLength4266 mm
1795 mmWidth1782 mm
1490 mmHeight1447 mm
1425 KgWeight1354 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 6 and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…