DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 5 vs 2010 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo S80
MazdaMakeVolvo
5ModelS80
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo S80
11,2 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
193 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower145 HP
191 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typePetrol / Ethanol – E85
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo S80
4585 mmLength4851 mm
1750 mmWidth1861 mm
1615 mmHeight1493 mm
1410 KgWeight1630 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 5 and 2010 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…