DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 323 vs 2002 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationBMW Z3
MazdaMakeBMW
323ModelZ3
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationBMW Z3
9,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
203 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
130 HPPower118 HP
171 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption11 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationBMW Z3
4290 mmLength4050 mm
1705 mmWidth1740 mm
1420 mmHeight1288 mm
1185 KgWeight1220 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 323 and 2002 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…