DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 323 vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZS
MazdaMakeMG
323ModelZS
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZS
9,7 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
203 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
130 HPPower113 HP
171 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZS
4290 mmLength4520 mm
1705 mmWidth1700 mm
1420 mmHeight1390 mm
1185 KgWeight1225 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 323 and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…