DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 323 vs 2002 Saturn SC Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SC

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationSaturn SC
MazdaMakeSaturn
323ModelSC
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationSaturn SC
12,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
178 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
90 HPPower100 HP
220 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationSaturn SC
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank46 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationSaturn SC
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationSaturn SC
4200 mmLength4575 mm
1705 mmWidth1709 mm
1410 mmHeight1326 mm
1175 KgWeight1070 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 323 and 2002 Saturn SC approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SC leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…