1998 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 2.0 DiTD (90 Hp) 1998Overall Score52.25/100
1998 Mazda 323 vs 1998 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i (115 Hp) 1998Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Omega
MazdaMakeOpel
323ModelOmega
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Omega
12,2 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
178 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower115 HP
220 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Omega
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank75 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Omega
4200 mmLength4785 mm
1705 mmWidth1785 mm
1410 mmHeight1450 mm
1175 KgWeight1460 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Mazda 323 and 1998 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…