DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mazda 323 vs 1995 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationBMW Z3
MazdaMakeBMW
323ModelZ3
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationBMW Z3
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
115 HPPower140 HP
157 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14 HTyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationBMW Z3
4035 mmLength4025 mm
1710 mmWidth1692 mm
1405 mmHeight1288 mm
1110 KgWeight1185 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mazda 323 and 1995 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…