DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda 323 vs 1994 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
MazdaMakeAudi
323Model80
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
115 HPPower137 HP
157 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption12,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
8 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14 HTyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
4035 mmLength4482 mm
1710 mmWidth1695 mm
1405 mmHeight1395 mm
1110 KgWeight1270 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda 323 and 1994 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…