DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mazda 323 vs 1992 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
MazdaMakeAudi
323Model80
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
11,0 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
190 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
103 HPPower90 HP
155 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
4260 mmLength4482 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1340 mmHeight1406 mm
1120 KgWeight1270 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mazda 323 and 1992 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…