1993 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.8 16V (103 Hp) 1993Overall Score58.5/100
1993 Mazda 323 vs 1993 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i CAT (99 Hp) 1993Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Omega
MazdaMakeOpel
323ModelOmega
1993Model year1993
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Omega
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
103 HPPower99 HP
155 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Omega
4260 mmLength4740 mm
1680 mmWidth1760 mm
1340 mmHeight1445 mm
1120 KgWeight1235 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Mazda 323 and 1993 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…