DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda 323 vs 1998 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationFord Focus
MazdaMakeFord
323ModelFocus
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationFord Focus
14,2 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
170 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
82 HPPower100 HP
168 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationFord Focus
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14 STyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationFord Focus
4340 mmLength4362 mm
1710 mmWidth1698 mm
1420 mmHeight1430 mm
1170 KgWeight1091 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda 323 and 1998 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…