DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 323 vs 1996 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Octavia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSkoda
323ModelOctavia
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,2 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
170 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
82 HPPower100 HP
168 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14 STyre size175/80 R14 88T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4340 mmLength4511 mm
1710 mmWidth1731 mm
1420 mmHeight1448 mm
1170 KgWeight1285 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2512 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 323 and 1996 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Octavia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…