DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda 323 vs 1994 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 400
MazdaMakeRover
323Model400
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 400
14,2 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
170 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
82 HPPower103 HP
168 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 400
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14 STyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 400
4340 mmLength4370 mm
1710 mmWidth1680 mm
1420 mmHeight1400 mm
1170 KgWeight1075 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda 323 and 1994 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…