E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mazda 323 vs 1992 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

44–44.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationFord Sierra
MazdaMakeFord
323ModelSierra
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationFord Sierra
150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
56 HPPower101 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationFord Sierra
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationFord Sierra
—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size—

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationFord Sierra
—Length4425 mm
—Width1694 mm
—Height1407 mm
—Wheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mazda 323 and 1992 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1992 Mercury CapriVS1992 Mazda 323Mercury Capri vs Mazda 3231992 and 1992 model years1992 Chrysler DynastyVS1992 Mazda 323Chrysler Dynasty vs Mazda 3231992 and 1992 model years1992 Daihatsu CharadeVS1992 Mazda 323Daihatsu Charade vs Mazda 3231992 and 1992 model years1992 Ford SierraVS1992 Mazda 323Ford Sierra vs Mazda 3231992 and 1992 model yearsImage unavailableVS1992 Mazda 323Nissan Pick UP vs Mazda 3231992 and 1992 model years

Comments are loading…