DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mazda 323 vs 1996 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeOpel
323ModelVectra
1995Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
182 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
88 HPPower82 HP
135 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
8 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4260 mmLength4495 mm
1680 mmWidth1707 mm
1340 mmHeight1425 mm
990 KgWeight1260 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mazda 323 and 1996 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…