E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda 323 vs 2023 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 33.75 points.

40.25–74
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationRenault Megane
MazdaMakeRenault
323ModelMegane
1994Model year2023
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationRenault Megane
—0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed205 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement1332 cc
88 HPPower140 HP
0 NmTorque240 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationRenault Megane
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears7
—TransmissionEDC
—Tyre size17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationRenault Megane
—Length4632 mm
—Width1814 mm
—Height1443 mm
—Weight1381 kg
—Luggage capacity503 lt

Additional Features

Mazda 323

No additional feature records are available.

Renault MeganeDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistAuto HoldCruise ControlCollision Avoidance SystemComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda 323 and 2023 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 33.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…