1996 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.5i 16V (88 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
1996 Mazda 323 vs 1996 Citroen Evasion Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Citroen
Evasion
Citroen Evasion 1.9 TD (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score45.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationCitroen Evasion
MazdaMakeCitroen
323ModelEvasion
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationCitroen Evasion
12,0 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
177 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1489 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
88 HPPower90 HP
132 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationCitroen Evasion
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationCitroen Evasion
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13 TTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationCitroen Evasion
4340 mmLength4454 mm
1710 mmWidth1812 mm
1420 mmHeight1710 mm
1070 KgWeight1575 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2823 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda 323 and 1996 Citroen Evasion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…