DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Kia Shuma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Shuma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Shuma
MazdaMakeKia
323ModelShuma
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Shuma
11,9 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
177 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
88 HPPower88 HP
132 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Shuma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Shuma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Shuma
4200 mmLength4475 mm
1705 mmWidth1711 mm
1410 mmHeight1427 mm
1115 KgWeight1100 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda 323 and 2000 Kia Shuma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…