DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 323 vs 1996 Daihatsu Pyzar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daihatsu Pyzar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

55.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeDaihatsu
323ModelPyzar
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1489 ccEngine displacement1495 cc
87 HPPower100 HP
132 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/70 R13 TTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4035 mmLength4050 mm
1710 mmWidth1640 mm
1405 mmHeight1620 mm
1065 KgWeight1080 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2395 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 323 and 1996 Daihatsu Pyzar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daihatsu Pyzar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…