DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2020 Mazda 3 vs 2019 Ford Tourneo Courier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
3ModelTourneo Courier
2020Model year2019
SedanBody typeMpv
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h0,0 s
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
105 HPPower95 HP
270 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank47 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption4,8 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ATTransmissionManual
18Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4470 mmLength4157 mm
1795 mmWidth1976 mm
1450 mmHeight1726 mm
1215 kgWeight1227 kg
364 ltLuggage capacity708 lt

Additional Features

Mazda 3Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth
Ford Tourneo CourierDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2020 Mazda 3 and 2019 Ford Tourneo Courier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…