DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda 3 vs 2012 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationJaguar XF
MazdaMakeJaguar
3ModelXF
2011Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationJaguar XF
6,1 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
250 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
260 HPPower200 HP
380 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationJaguar XF
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationJaguar XF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
225/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationJaguar XF
4505 mmLength4961 mm
1770 mmWidth1939 mm
1460 mmHeight1468 mm
1385 KgWeight1735 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda 3 and 2012 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…