DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 3 vs 2010 Subaru Impreza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSubaru
3ModelImpreza
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
260 HPPower300 HP
380 NmTorque407 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption13,0 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/40 R18Tyre size245/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4505 mmLength4415 mm
1770 mmWidth1740 mm
1460 mmHeight1475 mm
1385 KgWeight1395 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 3 and 2010 Subaru Impreza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…