DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 BMW Z4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW Z4
MazdaMakeBMW
3ModelZ4
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW Z4
8,2 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
213 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
185 HPPower184 HP
400 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW Z4
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW Z4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size225/45 R17 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW Z4
4460 mmLength4239 mm
1755 mmWidth1790 mm
1470 mmHeight1291 mm
1390 KgWeight1470 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2496 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 BMW Z4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…