2013 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.2 CD (185 Hp) 2013Overall Score73.75/100
2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 FAW Besturn B70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • FAW
Besturn B70
FAW Besturn B70 2.3 (163 Hp) 2013Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
FAW Besturn B70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationFAW Besturn B70
MazdaMakeFAW
3ModelBesturn B70
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationFAW Besturn B70
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
213 km/hTop speed207 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
185 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationFAW Besturn B70
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationFAW Besturn B70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationFAW Besturn B70
4460 mmLength4729 mm
1755 mmWidth1782 mm
1470 mmHeight1465 mm
1390 KgWeight1470 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 FAW Besturn B70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, FAW Besturn B70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…