DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mazda 3 vs 2009 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C5
MazdaMakeCitroen
3ModelC5
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C5
9,1 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
202 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
187 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C5
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank71 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C5
4415 mmLength4779 mm
1755 mmWidth1860 mm
1465 mmHeight1451-1458 mm
1260 KgWeight1608 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mazda 3 and 2009 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…