2016 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 SkyActiv-G (165 Hp) 2016Overall Score70.5/100
2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 SsangYong Korando Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • SsangYong
Korando
SsangYong Korando 2.0 e-XGi (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score71.25/100
WINNER
SsangYong Korando
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.5–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationSsangYong Korando
MazdaMakeSsangYong
3ModelKorando
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationSsangYong Korando
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
165 HPPower150 HP
210 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationSsangYong Korando
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank57 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationSsangYong Korando
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationSsangYong Korando
4460 mmLength4410 mm
1795 mmWidth1830 mm
1450 mmHeight1675 mm
1220 KgWeight1612 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2650 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 SsangYong Korando approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Korando leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…