2017 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 SkyActiv-G (120 Hp) 2017Overall Score65.25/100
2017 Mazda 3 vs 2017 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 2.0 CDTI (135 Hp) 2017Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Combo
MazdaMakeOpel
3ModelCombo
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Combo
8,9 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
195 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
120 HPPower135 HP
210 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16; 215/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Combo
4470 mmLength4390 mm
1795 mmWidth1831 mm
1465 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
1205-1291 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase2755 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Mazda 3 and 2017 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…