DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda 3 vs 2017 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationFord Galaxy
MazdaMakeFord
3ModelGalaxy
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationFord Galaxy
8,9 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
195 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
210 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationFord Galaxy
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationFord Galaxy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16; 215/45 R18Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationFord Galaxy
4470 mmLength4848 mm
1795 mmWidth1916 mm
1465 mmHeight1747 mm
1205-1291 KgWeight1677 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2849 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda 3 and 2017 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…