2016 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 SkyActiv-G (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Great Wall Steed Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Great Wall
Steed
Great Wall Steed 2.2i (106 Hp) 2016Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationGreat Wall Steed
MazdaMakeGreat Wall
3ModelSteed
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationGreat Wall Steed
8,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
120 HPPower106 HP
210 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationGreat Wall Steed
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationGreat Wall Steed
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationGreat Wall Steed
4460 mmLength5040 mm
1795 mmWidth1800 mm
1450 mmHeight1730 mm
1205 KgWeight1565 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase3050 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…