2009 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 DISI (151 Hp) 2009Overall Score62.5/100
2009 Mazda 3 vs 2009 Ford Galaxy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Ford
Galaxy
Ford Galaxy 2.3 i 16V (161 Hp) 2009Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Ford Galaxy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Galaxy
MazdaMakeFord
3ModelGalaxy
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Galaxy
10,4 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
206 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
151 HPPower161 HP
191 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Galaxy
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Galaxy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size215/60R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Galaxy
4460 mmLength4820 mm
1755 mmWidth1854 mm
1470 mmHeight1723 mm
1270 KgWeight1625 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Mazda 3 and 2009 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…