DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Mazda 3 vs 2008 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

67.75–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW X3
MazdaMakeBMW
3ModelX3
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW X3
9,9 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
203 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
360 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW X3
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank67 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW X3
4415 mmLength4569 mm
1755 mmWidth1853 mm
1465 mmHeight1674 mm
1410 KgWeight1655 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Mazda 3 and 2008 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…