DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Mazda 3 vs 2008 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationSaab 9-3
MazdaMakeSaab
3Model9-3
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationSaab 9-3
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
203 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
360 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationSaab 9-3
4415 mmLength4635 mm
1755 mmWidth1762 mm
1465 mmHeight1466 mm
1410 KgWeight1440 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Mazda 3 and 2008 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…