DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda 3 vs 2017 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 16.25 points.

54.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Astra
MazdaMakeOpel
3ModelAstra
2011Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Astra
12,2 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
184 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower170 HP
145 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Astra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank56 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Astra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Astra
4460 mmLength4466 mm
1755 mmWidth1840 mm
1470 mmHeight1482 mm
1180 KgWeight1503 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda 3 and 2017 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 16.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…