DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 3 vs 2010 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
3ModelV50
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V50
12,2 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
105 HPPower100 HP
145 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V50
4460 mmLength4522 mm
1755 mmWidth1845 mm
1470 mmHeight1457 mm
1180 KgWeight1335 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 3 and 2010 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…