DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 3 vs 2009 Toyota Corolla Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Corolla

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

54.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
3ModelCorolla
2010Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
184 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower124 HP
145 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4540 mm
1755 mmWidth1760 mm
1470 mmHeight1470 mm
1180 KgWeight1300 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 3 and 2009 Toyota Corolla approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Corolla leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…