2010 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.6i (105 Hp) 2010Overall Score54.25/100
2010 Mazda 3 vs 2010 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.6 Duratec 16V (100 Hp) 2010Overall Score48.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6 points.
54.25–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
MazdaMakeFord
3ModelFocus
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
12,2 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement0 cc
105 HPPower100 HP
145 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
4460 mmLength—
1755 mmWidth—
1470 mmHeight—
1180 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mazda 3 and 2010 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…